Remind me again why this is beneficial? So let’s say the knicks miss the top 6 by a game, or even home court advantage by the 5th seed etc. IF the nba wants to continue with this they MUST give some sort of reward for the regular season and an edge in the real playoffs, because this feels more like a punishment.

  • em7924B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks… Yeah… I figure since the NBA designed the In-Season Tournament in a Group play and point differential format (like soccer) then it would only make sense for them to eventually do a point-based system for the entire regular season.

    I would even like to see the NBA get rid of overtime. Instead, they should do something similar to hockey and soccer to break the tie after multiple overtimes. After regulation, if the game is tied, the home team would get to choose from 1 of 3 options to decide the winner:

    (1v1) Free-throw shooting contest (best free throw shooter from each team would take 5 free throw shots. If the score is still tied after 5 attempts, each player would take alternate turns shooting free throws until someone misses and the other one makes it)

    (1v1) Game of H.O.R.S.E. (best field goal shooter from each team play against each other in a traditional game of H.O.R.S.E. If the game is tied after, they keep going until a winner is determined)

    (5v1) Score in the Paint (the best defender from each team has 5 attempts to stop the opposing team’s 5 best scorers from scoring in the paint, similar to a shootout in hockey or penalty-shootout in soccer. The basket has to be scored inside of the paint or the point doesn’t count. If the game is tied after 5 attempts, they keep going until a winner is determined). -this strategy would be best for a team with a dominant lock-down defender-