1. CBS. Simple, straightforward, unobtrusive, and easy to read.

2. ESPN. Unobtrusive and easy to read, but excessively horizontal.

3. FOX. Nice and compact, but too busy, and the information on the translucent backgrounds would be better off beside or below the team logos.

4. PRIME: Easy to read, but I don’t like the font.

5. NBC. Too small, so the information is not as easy to read as it should be.

I’m leaning towards MNF, just because it takes up the least space on the screen. Space aside, I like Fox’s and I love how they use drawings of players rather than the standard portraits.

CBS

These aren’t correct. CBS doesn’t display a clock anymore.

CBS hands down

CBS or MNF

I like how MNF indicates who has the ball. I like how CBS indicates current records.

I hate the boxy style indicators but information density is my biggest judgement factor.

I like CBS reminds me of when my brother would have football on and I didn’t give a fuck about it but it’s nostalgic now so 🤷‍♂️

Whichever one was on last week for Steelers Bengals was horrendous. They had black as the color for Steelers Timeouts which to me reads as the Steelers have already used ALL time outs.

It’s between ESPN and FOX for me. CBS is probably the worst.

TNF

I like CBS

My question is why do they always have to mess with it for the Super Bowl. Like going to try a new design for next year let’s test it out at the biggest game possible.

TNF is my favorite aesthetically, but if we’re talking form over function, I like CBS. Ironically, timeouts are the most obvious on Fox’s scorecard, but I generally don’t like it for some reason?

It also depends on where I am; at home, anything is fine. At the bar, I need it legible from a distance.

I like CBS personally!

ESPN is concise clear with good spacing and a decent font