The debates in Oklahoma City over the wisdom of coughing over arena money while other pressing issues exist is painfully familiar to longtime Seattle residents.
What kind of split should it be then just out of curiosity? I imagine an owner that’s worth just $1B can’t exactly pay 100% of +900M stadium unless most of that wealth is liquid
What kind of split should it be then just out of curiosity? I imagine an owner that’s worth just $1B can’t exactly pay 100% of +900M stadium unless most of that wealth is liquid