Happy to get killed here, but everyone I heard on radio and TV brought up how we should beat a team with -9 passing yards, (btw they also conveniently neglect that we actually did beat them), and then start to trash ZW.

ZW had 240 yards in driving rain, where the opposition could only muster -9 yards! Isn’t this actually a testament how well he did? I get it, he took untimely, unnecessary sacks! But in a condition where two opposing QBs could only combine to achieve 9 yards going backwards, ZW deserves a lot of credits for his performance.

  • mashingLumpkinsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the argument Orlovsky made this morning, and I agree with it. 3rd string center and a non existent run game, too. I think we ended the day with like 15 rushing yards. All those things considered, Zach played well.