• تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        innocent people

        Hah! Funny! I hope you are lying and don’t actually believe it.

        We both clearly want the same thing though, but we foresee different outcomes. We want to bait the US into another war in our region because we have strong confidence it will be defeated. You though clearly forgot the lessons of Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq and need a refresher :)

        • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          So the workers on the tankers getting shot at are considered enemy combatants? Because if not, then they’d be innocent people.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            They’re about as much enemy combatants as workers in military factories, and those have been fair game since forever.

          • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Innocent people have nothing to hide and would respond to the requests of authorities. The ships were clearly headed to enemy ports, and intentionally ignored the requests to turn around.

            Edit: The Red Sea and the Arabian Sea are under Yemeni authority. Non-enemy ships can pass, but for the enemy… Don’t like it? You are free to sail around Africa

              • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                No. Rules imply they are capricious and can change at whim. We have seen that in the US’s actions many times. What the world need are laws that no one can be above or allowed to veto.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think they mean out of Israel since that’s why the Houthis are attacking but that would mean giving up a strategic advantage in the middle east so very little chance that’ll ever happen

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    There were liberals saying, “I can’t wait for the Houthis to find out why we don’t have Universal Healthcare.” They did. Your shitty governance and selling out the MIC completely to private interests is why.

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      They really need a refresher. They are clearly not contend with losing to Iraq and Afghanistan, they need to lose in Yemen too. Just like they haven’t learned any lesson from Vietnam.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        It comes back to how deeply rooted American Exceptionalism is in the American psyche. There’s this idea that you can always win, in fact you are supposed to win, so if you lose it’s because you made a mistake. There’s no such thing as a no-win scenario, and there’s no such thing as doing everything you can but losing to an opponent who also knows what they’re doing.

        The easiest place to see this mentality is in American sports fans. The opinion “the other guys are professionals too and are sometimes just better” is always in the extreme minority. And people are more tribal and less rational about nationalism than sports fandom.

  • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Every admiral would tell his political superiors that military necessity would call for attacks on Houthi missile infrastructure on the ground in Yemen: fixed and mobile launch sites, production and storage facilities, command centres and whatever little radar infrastructure there exists.

    This has to already be happening, certainly through Saudi Arabia, probably also with direct, covert U.S. action.

    • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yup. The US has already been fighting Ansar Allah using Saudi Arabia and UAE for years. I am familiar with it, my city (Jeddah) has been struck by them. I’m just bad at nationalism that I still support them and even more so now. Not just me, but they are now more popular than ever in Yemen and around the region.

      The US will learn soon enough that Afghanistan was easy mode compared to Yemen.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Doesn’t the US have a navy so big that the next 3 biggest navies combined aren’t as big or something insane like that?

    The article itself doesn’t really explain much. Apparently one destroyer managed to hold off 9 hours worth of attacks and the US has mostly been using SAM platforms to shoot down missiles but nothing about how Houthis could actually achieve anything.

    I would even cheer for the Houthis if they were fighting to support Palestine even if it is hopeless but they are just doing Somali pirates 2.0 from the look of things.

    • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The egregious cost of interceptors compared to the missiles themself make it possible for even Yemen to drain US military assets in the region.