My only complaint is not trading Moss. He will be a free agent after this season and we shouldn’t invest more money in the RB position by resigning him. So trading him for at least something would’ve been a wise move.

Other than that I didn’t expect much from Ballard who’s conservative by nature and he probably views this as a rebuilding year anyway. It would have been nice to get a corner or another receiver though. Hopefully he is more aggressive this offseason with AR coming back.

  • MOPAR-ChironB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would have liked to see Moss traded for an upgrade or depth at corner.

    I’m mainly confused about this year’s approach. It’s a lost year without AR but we also are trying to win, but also not trying to improve our roster?

    We have depth in positions of luxury and nothing in some positions of necessity.

    Not saying I know shit, but it’s weird

  • MoistCloyster_B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we didn’t move Moss because we still don’t know where we’re at. We have 3 wins but have been competitive as well as having an easy remaining schedule so keeping Moss makes sense if we can still be competitive.

  • RelentlessRogueB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://www.tankathon.com/nfl

    We’re currently picking 7th overall if the season ended today, and our secondary and QB are liabilities.

    Doesn’t make sense to trade for, and we don’t really have anyone to trade away.

  • CommonerChaosB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meh, NFL rarely has trades. It’s not like the NBA, where the trade deadline becomes F5 season.