Check the modlog for proof, a discussion post about moving this instance to an instance that shan’t be named now got removed for “linking to instance featuring pedo content”.
Ironically that exact possibility was reason for the discussion in the first place so seeing it happen this quickly is a bit funny.
Not sure how best to go about linking to said instance since it seems to get your content removed. DM’s would be the only solution I guess but not sure if those are checked as well.
For context, I encourage people to check this discussion in the “join Lemmy” site github. Have in mind that both of the Lemmy developers in that discussion are also admins of the lemmy.ml instance, and they clearly disagree if the instance in question should be considered as “hosting CSAM” or not.
Yup, that was a bit of a shit show all around, made the rounds in the privacy communities as well and they were not pleased with the blatant censorship over there either. I guess stuff like this is why a lot of those people hang around dbzer0 now. To each interest an instance with fitting policies I guess.
The really sad part though is how it locks in users on lemmy.ml, you can’t even really link to a safe haven because doing so is already grounds to get the post/comment removed
Pretty happy with my instance. :)
Tbf though I don’t check the mod log.
Do you get a message if something happened with your post?Not sure, never happened to me yet. I’d guess so. I noticed with the previous discussion post because I have instance admin superpowers (jokes aside as admin I still see deleted posts even on other instances)
I saw that post yesterday. It’s true but it says “mods” for me:
Kinda crazy when its linked at the sidebar.
These actions are being taken by
.mlsite admin Arthur Besse / cypherpunks. There’s nothing I can do as a mere community mod ^^this comment was deleted by someone else for disclosing the identity behind a mod action, but since it was my identity being revealed i am choosing to reply to it.
These actions are being taken by .ml site admin Arthur Besse / cypherpunks. There’s nothing I can do as a mere community mod ^^
As a moderator, you could and imo definitely should remove the links to that instance from the sidebar, and in their place put a note mentioning that sexualized drawings of children are not allowed here. I’m not really into anime but I have enjoyed some and I would rather that we could have a community for it here than not. But, that requires moderators who are willing to delete things like that (not to mention not link to it themselves).
Any volunteers?
Removed by mod
Yeah that makes sense
To add a bit more opinion: If you have an account on lemmy.ml itself and read/comment in either the Anime or Manga community I urgently recommend you migrate to a different instance. As far as I can tell the instance we shan’t name here anymore for fear of admin abuse is still visible on join-lemmy.org after widespread complaints that removing an instance from there based on admin opinion alone is not exactly nice.
Best way to tell you how to find it is go to join-lemmy.org and look for an obviously anime themed instance in the “Art” category. Not sure if just saying that is grounds for removal though, depends on how trigger happy the admins here are.
ml admins hate anime and don’t want it on their instance. Simple as that.
I mean yeah, that’s why the talk about moving the stragglers was even brought up. Keeping this anime community is neither in the best interest of the .ml admins nor in the best interest of the community.
Its really unfortunate that the ml admins are the way they are. Too bad there cant be a mass mod message sent as a DM to subscribers telling them where to move to. That make sit tedious and can make those left behind feel lost. But I guess if enough move over and the anime community that is more social than this one gets bigger maybe itll be easier to find? Who knows.
I was only here because it was the first search result a while back.
Can’t you pin a message in a board so if members would be informed if they choose to investigate why theres no content?
I miss the animation age ghetto, tbh, this new Japanese hate is way more annoying.
I just moved to lemm.ee from lemmy.ml because I was tired of the .ml admins constantly removing any minor criticism of BRICS-allied countries for “xenophobia”. I think it would be a good idea to abandon the instance altogether, especially for topics such as world news.
Pretty weird move to develop a social media platform with a transparent modlog and still partake in censorship on your own instance.
I’ve not heard many positive things about the ml instance. I ended up on the dot world because I didn’t know that much about the fediverse. Hell, I still don’t know that much.
Sorry for the double reply. Here’s a practical idea: what if the mods of this comm contacted lemmy.ml’s admins? Ideally doing two things:
- Clarifying that the instance in question does not have child sexual abuse material, and requesting users to be allowed to link it.
- Expressing desire to migrate !anime@lemmy.ml to the instance in question, and highlighting that this is convenient for both sides of the matter.
Among the admins I think that Nutomic would be the best to contact, given the github thread.
I highly doubt 1 will work given the reaction they had initially to claims it contains csam. 2 could potentially work though, maybe they’d have to write in a disclaimer of sorts to get the admins on board. If the link is the problem and not the wording just writing the instance name without a link would also work I guess.
@N3DSdude, @Nami, @ram, @rammy What are the mods’ thoughts on this idea?
Removed by mod
I mean yeah let’s try it absolutely, just doubtful it’ll work.
Maybe link to a community which can then link to the actual target? Both beehaw and lemmy.world have general anime communities. Not a perfect solution, granted, but it might be a usable workaround.
Really showing your ass here by suggesting that you want to move to an instance with pedo content.
edit: undeleted for posterity
I see two options as to why you made that comment:
1: you just blindly believe what that admin said and have no opinion of your own, if that is the case I highly doubt a discussion is possible
2: you actually believe anime is csam in which case a discussion won’t be possible either because we don’t share the same definition of what csam is
As a closing note I find it hilarious that someone from hexbear of all places tries to ridicule people for trying to move to a safe space for their community
Edit: case in point against the csam claim is the fact that the instance in question got re-added to join-lemmy.org because the material that got it removed was not remotely seen as csam by the other maintaners
Well at first I assumed there was probably validity to what Dessalines said, because I consider them credible and I know enough about anime to know that there is a lot of csam that hides behind bullshit justifications. Even in this thread there’s discussion of a show that blatantly tittilates the audience with underage characters that would absolutely qualify as csam in any other community except in the anime community, for some reason.
And then I went onto the anime lemmy everyone is surreptitiously talking about, and the literal first post I saw was a body pillow design featuring an underage character that is right on the line of being csam. It was the only example I saw in my brief look, and it didn’t quite qualify, which is why I came back and deleted my comment.
I don’t care about what the maintainers’ view of the matter is, I make (and sometimes delete) my comments based on my own view of it.
Even in this thread there’s discussion of a show that blatantly tittilates the audience with underage characters that would absolutely qualify as csam in any other community except in the anime community, for some reason.
Emphasis mine. If what you are saying is indeed correct (is it? dunno), this is a sign that the acronym “CSAM” was completely derailed.
Originally the expression “child sexual abuse material” was coined to avoid implications of consent brought by the word “pornography”, and it boils down to “evidence of child sexual abuse”. Consent and sexual abuse are legal notions that only apply to real people, not to fictional characters.
In the meantime, at worst the instance in question depicts images of clearly fictional characters in suggestive poses and/or clothing. It does not classify even as pornography, let alone sexual abuse. (Note that not even hentai depicting clearly adult characters is allowed in that instance.)
I don’t care about what the maintainers’ view of the matter is, I make (and sometimes delete) my comments based on my own view of it.
Given that this is a touchy subject, I think that this matter is better handled neither by the maintainers’ views nor by our own views, but by 1) legal definitions of governments that might be relevant in the matter, and 2) explicit moral premises.
I may have an extremely warped opinion on this due to several reasons (imo mostly due to irl encounters with adult people that would put you on a watch list due to how young they look) but I think in the end it usually boils down to anime/manga just being terrible media for portraying how old a character actually is. The oldest anime character you can draw will still look significantly younger than a person you meet irl simply because the art style hides a lot of the age marks.
Edit: which is not to say that there isn’t a lot of CSAM hiding, it’s just imo the stuff that gets popular on SFW platforms is rarely that stuff
If anime is child porn, then so is all live action media.
Not all anime of course, but you’ve got to be delusional to believe that the depths that anime sometimes sinks with regards to loli and shota content is matched by other mass-market mediums.
To be fair with the above, even considering that he’s being disingenuous*, his [AFAIK incorrect] claim is not “anime is child porn”, it’s “that anime instance has child porn”.
*note how he’s trying to transform “is this CSAM?” into a subjective matter. That’s rather close to the moving goalposts fallacy.
It’s weird that this /c !anime@lemmy.ml doesn’t show up on neither Feddit’s Community Browser https://browse.feddit.de/ or Lemmy Explorer https://lemmyverse.net/communities when searching for “anime”
Instead anime@(the-instance-that-shall-not-be-named).social shows up first on Community Browser, and
I’m not sure what to make of that.
Is someone trying to shadow deprecate this /c/ ?
I highly doubt anyone is actively fucking with the /c here (other than the admins). I’d simply suspect missing metadata or some shit before assuming someone is somehow covertly sabotaging multiple open content discovery services for the fediverse.
The source code for lemmyverse is public so there’s no need to just speculate. I haven’t checked myself but I highly doubt anime@lemmy.ml is somehow getting filtered out of the search results. Imo it’s mich more likely that the community is just the victim of some bug. Maybe check again in a few days, I know lemmyverse had issues with communities disappearing when they couldn’t be reached during the listing updates.
Like @neshura@bookwormstory.social said, those sites have instances drop on and off the rankings all the time. I had been checking lemmyverse quite frequently over the past couple months…for no reason I am going to mention in this thread…and instances will disappear and reappear every couple days. The ml instance in particular was prone to that. No foul play going on, just typical software flakiness.
