I don’t know why I even bother opening the settings app

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, it was intentional in a way, so the definition of bug is hazy, but the functioning version would be the ExFAT format.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      But the problem isn’t in Fat32 itself, as you can format larger disks in that format just fine

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes, the final line of my comment explains that, it’s just that the cluster size in Fat32 has a lower bound so if you have files smaller than the cluster then they take a whole cluster, and that can lead to cluster slack that is vast majority wasted space.