given that the word 'pants ’ sounds like a plural, perhaps we can assume each leg is an independent entity and deserves its own pair of pants. i chose left.
Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?
“Yes, Sir. I would like to buy one pant!”
This is how you say it in French. “Un Pantalon”
But we have “legs” and give each leg a pant. Therefore wouldn’t each pant also just have one pant?
Pant
Pants have the same number of legs as people. This joke is getting absurd.
That’s the joke
Yes. And it’s absurd.
It’s a type of humour I suppose, I like absurd humour that makes fun of the concept
So you’re saying the one in the right then?
Teachers: You should try do something productive in your free time
Me in my free time:
The math teacher, who knows you’re about to accidentally learn about recursion and series:
Let’s use geometric progression to find how many rows we can create with a set of 200 pants!
Maybe even topology!
Okay, which one of you wears pants on each leg?
Like on the right. Left side is wasteful and floppy
Eschew bifurcated clothing!!
Did the pants on the left split its legs down the middle?
Right Because the left would get significantly more difficult once you start adding more pants
If a pants’s pants wore pants, what would it look like?
Like this.
