Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works to sh.itjust.works Main Community@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 8 months agoOnline anonymity: study found ‘stable pseudonyms’ created a more civil environment than real user namestheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down15
arrow-up168arrow-down1external-linkOnline anonymity: study found ‘stable pseudonyms’ created a more civil environment than real user namestheconversation.comZiggurat@sh.itjust.works to sh.itjust.works Main Community@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareRightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down2·8 months ago We built a data set of 45 million comments on news articles on the Huffington Post website between January 2013 and February 2015. I am no expert but I feel like this is a really bad data set choice for this study.
minus-squareKuroeNekoDemon@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·8 months agoIt is. They should’ve used Reddit and Twitter posts/comments from it’s start to the present to get a more accurate database
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoOr from the start up until like 2016 when the shills and bots started showing up en masse.
minus-squareMomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·8 months agoIt’s just a bad data set for basically anything
minus-square✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agowe built a dataset of three of my comments and found that…
I am no expert but I feel like this is a really bad data set choice for this study.
It is. They should’ve used Reddit and Twitter posts/comments from it’s start to the present to get a more accurate database
Or from the start up until like 2016 when the shills and bots started showing up en masse.
It’s just a bad data set for basically anything
we built a dataset of three of my comments and found that…