• ???@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They were unarmed and getting treatment at the hospital. That’s against international humanitarian law. Several people have linked to this in the thread. I suggest you read them.

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Why do you keep mentioning October 7th? We’re talking about something else and October 7th is not a license to break IHL.

        And no, you are wrong, they are not a legitimate target when unarmed and being treated at a hospital.

          • ???@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, well, too bad that the Geneva Convention disagrees with killing people in hospitals that have protected status under IHL.

          • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            If “they broke international law first, so it’s now fine for me to” is a legitimate justification as you say, then Isreals decades of international law violations would make Oct 7th fully legitimate too.

      • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        If “they broke international law first, so it’s now fine for me to” is a legitimate justification as you say, then Isreals decades of international law violations would make Oct 7th fully legitimate too.