• Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not to defend this game in particular, but criticizing a game for its length vs cost alone is a bad trend that leads to Ubisoft-esque bloat and padding. There are plenty of shorter games that were well worth the price (Revengence, Titanfall 2, Portal 2, hell, most of Valve’s full single player games to name some)

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah I did the same for a while. Thought about I like 1 dollar per 1 hour. So if I payed 50 dollar for a 70 hour game that’s good.

        Now I think that a game with 8 hours can be worth 70.

      • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ubisoft padding doesn’t count for length for me. I ain’t getting the 27000 collectibles, AC is 20h long not 200h long.

        • all-knight-party@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, it’s not just collectibles that make those games big. Large worlds with many side quests, RPG or skill systems that require a lot of grinding to progress. It’s not like the game is designed the same way as Call of Duty, except there’s collectibles, Ubisoft’s games are fundementally bigger.

          • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fair enough, and it is definitely bigger. But in my mind, systems that get no engagement from me are systems that don’t exist, therefore making the game smaller.

            What I particularly hate is the catacombs and other recycled open world stuff in Elden Ring. I’d much rather have another Sekiro sized game with a lot of quality than a 100h+ game I’ll only play once, because replaying anything more than the main progression path feels like a chore but it still gives you loot.

        • loobkoob@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Around 15 hours for someone who goes in completely blind, I think. Or 20 minutes for someone who knows what they’re doing!

            • loobkoob@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Mine, too! It really showcases the kind of narrative that is only possible with the interactivity of video games as a medium. If I could experience any game again for the first time, it’d be Outer Wilds!

  • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Might it be better in future to screenshot the post, quote the text and cite the author/poster, supposing one wants to avoid any linking to Twitter?

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some people like twitter or want more context, I might screenshot the posts in the future with how Nitter is getting clamped down on.