Funniest “but at what cost…?” I will ever post.
I never liked or supported Taliban. I’m too hedonistic and individualistic for their ideology, but I do like the fact that they defeated the US. They were the legitimate government of Afghanistan in 2001, they were willing to cooperate with the US then but the US chose violence. 20 years later and 2.3 trillion dollars wasted, they are still the legitimate government of Afghanistan and Vichy Afghanistan crumbled in days.
Here’s a VoA article on the matter:
https://www.voanews.com/a/china-s-president-receives-afghan-ambassador-taliban-seek-recognition-from-russia-iran-/7463837.htmlImagine citing fucking VoA lmfao. Who occupied Afghanistan for decades, again!
Central Asia may finally be stabilizing? The Taliban might not be your ideal government, but it’s a well-supported government in a region that’s dealt with way too much chaos and way too much bloodshed.
Removed by mod
How much you wanna bet those upvotes are coming from lemmy world and sh.ithole
These are not stable people. They are drug traffickers, kidnappers for profit, slavers, employers of child soldiers, rapists and mass murderers, who justify their criminal behavior with religious extremism. They are not a government. They are the chaos. They are the bloodshed. Nothing good can come of legitimizing their rule.
But enough about the US government, let’s get back to talking about the Taliban.
You’re the only one talking about the US.
You may want to double check your facts. If I were you, thankfully I am not, I would take the defeat and move on. No one wants what the West is selling, you had 20 years and 2.3 trillion dollars to prove your point and you failed.
What do you mean? You described the US to a T.
So is your argument here then that the US was a stabilizing force? Or that the US military was undertaking mass rape campaigns?
If you considered Vichy Afghanistan to be stable. It clearly crumbled immediately.
No.
Ok, so just “US bad”, got it.
