• tan00k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whose authority says it’s not sufficient? If they say they are nonbinary, they are nonbinary.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      OP means “don’t assume someone is non-binary because they are an effeminate man” and not “you aren’t non-binary just because you are an effeminate man”

      • tan00k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I suppose that’s possible, but the thing you say OP is not saying is literally a quote. So at best it’s worded poorly.

    • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a miscommunication, you two are not really in disagreement as far as I can see. If someone {presents as an effeminate man} AND {they say they’re non-binary} => {they are non-binary}. However if someone {presents as an effeminate man} AND does NOT {say they’re non-binary}… Then it’s not sufficient.