Even though different Linux distros are often fairly close in terms of real-life performance and all of them have a clear advantage over Windows in many use cases, we can’t reject the fact that Arch Linux has undoubtedly won the competition. And now I’m so glad to have another reason to proudly say “I use Arch btw”

::: It was a joke of course :::

      • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        Where’d you get that image? I made that 7 or 8 years ago. Has it been making the rounds? It’s weird to see it in the wild lol

          • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I did, yeah. I thought the original flowchart was really childish and cringy so I made this and posted it on some Linux circlejerk sub on reddit. It didn’t get any traction, I’m shocked to see it pop up years later. I guess somebody must have liked it

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Windows wouldn’t be too terrible if it wasn’t for all the pop ups all the time.

        I need to work with it because I need to create a WPF app with Visual Studio, and when I switch from Windows to my personal computer, the difference is mind blowing.

        Windows push you fucking add with a notification sound. It’s probably on me that I didn’t disable yet, but I don’t have to do that on any Linux distro.

      • sachamato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        AW man, my first choice back in the days was Debian. Seeing now your map made me remember the pain of learning along the way while solving nuclear bomb events and configurations that I had no idea even existed. Still, it was a great experience! Nowadays I just use win 11.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    How is fedora 2x faster in video rendering? I don’t get the huge gaps between the Linux distros in general. Like arch being 20% slower in php and Ubuntu 20% faster in kernel compilation

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it depends on kernel/software/driver versions and will vary when these change. Also bloatware is a thing, even though it doesn’t affect the results very significantly

    • tiny@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Different distros build their packages with different options and have different versions of those packages so the Ubuntu and fedora php packages might have an optimization the arch one didn’t

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Does anyone have a similar video but only for graphics. I want to know more about the floating point ops, OpenGL and DirectX with Wine compared across those 4.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t remember such videos. Though there should be Windows vs Linux benckmarks for popular games that support both operating systems (natively or with Wine)

  • scratchandgame@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Tiếng Việt
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    FreeBSD’s boot speed is just behind arch a little bit (on HDD).

    But Windows 8 (with fast startup) on an core 2 duo machine with 1G of RAM boot faster than any debian, ubuntu. (the boot speed decrease when you upgrade hardware lol :) )

  • 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You know Arch users can just tattoo it on their forehead. That way they don’t even have to say ‘btw, I use arch’. People can read it on their face.