• random9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    The point, which you missed, is that going to github, a source code hosting service, to look for downloading executables for your specific platform - is like going to a farmer’s market to try and get a ready made meal. You’re at the wrong place, and it’s not meant for you if that’s what you’re looking for.

    Github is fairly user friendly, but it’s users are developers.

    • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m a developer and I hardly ever compile shit for my personal computer from source. I’d rather use a package manager, sure, but on Windows that’s by far the exception to the rule and if you want regular users to use your app, it needs to be a downloadable EXE.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This. Building a random app from source and tracking down its many dependencies is a massive pain in the ass, doubly so on Windows where you have to jump through a ridiculous number of hoops just to install a C compiler.

        • AProfessional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This can be true and still irrelevant. It’s a free git repo host. Binaries are not its main purpose and random users complaints don’t matter.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      But when consumers get in contact with Github - and they do get in contact at some point - it is to download executables, since a good number of consumer-facing software which isnt on an app store does simply release their executables on github. That twists people’s understanding of what the platform is.