• jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Generational labeling…

    I see it as a way to divide the working class, same as the “lower class”/“middle class” and “unskilled labor”/“skilled labor”.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d be inclined to believe you if the boomers weren’t literally the ruling class.

      Even the poor ones are still land owners, and meanwhile the rest of us have to fight uphill both ways to get a single measly Congress seat!

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Let me tell you, then… Boomers are NOT the ruling class. A small group of rich people control most of the wealth in the world. Those people are the ruling class.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Really? Because when I see the folks that hold the line against anything positive getting done, I don’t see rich people, I see wannabe rich boomers. Blocking legislation, packing courts, gerrymandering, keeping the electoral college, introducing politics of spite, it’s all the fucking boomers and I refuse to be gaslit that they aren’t at the core of the problem.

      • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Edit: Great question, thanks for asking!

        Division of the working class keeps us fighting ourselves, while the people with money and power keep the status quo.

        Great activists in US history have tried to unite the working class, but sadly they tend to get assasinated…


        I thought this video would explain where some of us have learned how the class system works.

        Economist Richard Wolff explains our class society.

        How Class Works – by Richard Wolff [12:36]

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=euH3pAuLuko

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lemmy is a FOSS answer to the failings of Capitalist Reddit. Everyone who doesn’t care enough is on Reddit, leaving Lemmy with tons of leftists who do care enough.

        There’s also Linux, Privacy, and other FOSS things, but FOSS in general aligns with leftist views.

      • pearable@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Short answer is a person’s class, and the class they serve, is the single most important factor for the amount of power an individual is capable of gaining in society. Class in this context is how you get the money you need to live. The owning class get that money by owning businesses, land, buildings, or intellectual property. The working class gets it by working.

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because the principle struggle is the class struggle between the working class and the owning classes, all other strugles are either secondary, incidental, or made up in order to distract us from the principle strugle, or a combination of the above. Once one learns this, the world starts to lock into a better prospective and we can start working to our ultimate goal, making a stew from the Rich

        • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          all other strugles are either secondary, incidental, or made up in order to distract us from the principle strugle

          I’ve heard this from syndicalists so many times as an excuse for disinvesting from any other contemporary struggle. They end up alienating everyone who cares for more than one issue.

          • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            First, I am not a syndicalist, I know that is not important but I feel I should mention it, because as the meme goes, there is no one a leftist hates more than a sligtly difrent leftist.

            I also never said “do not care about other issues” or “other strugles do not exist” I would also be wrong to say to disinvest from the suffering from others, however it is important to remember that 1) the primary struggle is that of class, and second most of those secondary and tertiary struggles, atleast under the status quo, can be traced back to the primary struggle, and that we cannot get a true and proper fix for them, or atleast it is significatly harder to do, if we do not work on fixing the primary struggle

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sexism is not solved with more female CEOs.

            Racism is not solved with billionaire POCs.

            Queerphobia is not solved with more LGBTQ+ media representation.

            The primary oppression is of the working class, and being a member of any of these marginalised groups simply fast tracks you to working class.

            That’s not to say there aren’t systemic prejudices. Of course there are. But these primarily serve to keep the group of elites small and ever more exclusive.

            • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The primary oppression is of the working class, and being a member of any of these marginalised groups simply fast tracks you to working class.

              i am not interested in arguing. I thought, maybe if you read what you wrote, you may see that it’s incorrect. Can you see it?