• Kostyeah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    What a garbage article lol. The only two arguments I can pick out are 1. Old steam games haven’t been updated to work on macOS and 2. Some games require 3rd party launchers. I think the author was just angry that his mac dropped support for a 20 year old game.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You forgot the Mac

    Lol, fuck Mac. If Apple cared about gaming, they wouldn’t have created Metal and collaborated on Vulkan. Fuck them. Valve went with Linux because they can change it to fit their needs. Can’t do that with Apple.
    Microsoft is only supported by Valve because it has large marketshare and can’t be ignored, but it’s clear that Valve is doing everything possible to get away from them: see Steam Deck.

    In general, I agree with Steam wielding too much power and if they abused it, I’d be out. I have my gaming hours and can live without gaming no problem. They wouldn’t get any more money from me as soon as they enshittified.

    What would get me away from steam is an opensource gaming store with games that have no DRM and are predominantly opensource. Or another gaming store that worked on Linux and allowed playing games with my other linux buddies.
    Get us that and I’m out.

    Anti Commercial AI thingy

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I disagree with the author, the enshittification of Steam started ages ago. Day one, in fact. It’s come and gone in waves.

    Yesterday there was an article on the exploitative practices of Roblox doing the rounds around here. Some of the bad praxis around monetized UGC called out there was pioneered by Steam. Online DRM for single player games? Steam was there at ground level. NFT stock markets? Steam tried really hard, they were just bad at it. Gig economy automation replacing human moderation and greenlight processes? They banged their head against that wall until they uberified PC game development successfully. Loot boxes? They are remarkably resilient. Where others have moved on, Valve insists on keeping them around for CounterStrike 2.

    Also, CounterStrike 2.

    There are also ways in which Steam is ahead of the competition, or they wouldn’t have the near-monopolistic position they have. Their Linux support may be motivated entirely out of spite and an ironic fear of Microsoft’s monopoly, but it’s welcomed. Their client is easily the best in the market and there are crucial features from it that should have been universalized by MS or Nvidia and still haven’t been, somehow. It’s good stuff.

    But it’s been enshittified since day one of Steam, when it launched torjan horsed with CS and Half Life 2, and it remains problematic in many areas, including its role as a single point of failure for game preservation on PC.

  • pythonoob@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol at the last section of the article. Valve is actually bad guys! Just trust me!

    Valve won’t stay that way forever—the company is not immune to the pressures of capitalism, and there are already examples of anti-consumer behavior.

    Eventually, the bomb will go off, and the full ‘enshittification’ of Steam will commence.

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is why beehaw needs downvotes. Crappy submissions like this article that don’t make any sense

    Edit: OP has been spamming his nonsense across multiple communities, and has hundreds of downvotes on each of them. Except here on beehaw…

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      fwiw, OP wrote the article himself and then spammed it to lots of different instances. Definitely worth blocking this spammer.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you… I was reading and thinking “this makes no sense… Does the author know what a monopoly actually is??”