• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re right we should be running dogs for western imperialism instead.

    Ah yes, because there are only two options, you’re either a running dog for western imperialism or a running dog for Russian imperialism. But being a running dog for Russian imperialism is actually cool because it will lead to communism somehow. Don’t ask what happens in between, that’s not important…

    And yes it will improve revolutionary conditions as the contradictions become more aparent

    Wow that’s incredible, why don’t we just skip waiting for the imperialists to do it and carry out the genocide ourselves. That’ll really make those contradictions more apparent, I can’t wait!

    • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah yes, because there are only two options

      It’s almost like there isn’t, right? Could it be the “critical” part in “critical support”?

      Wow that’s incredible, why don’t we just skip waiting for the imperialists to do it and carry out the genocide ourselves.

      Your brain is melting wtf are you even saying?

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I thought it would be obvious I was mocking you by repeating the viewpoint you expressed without the air of pretentiousness that you surround it with, but I guess I was the stupid one for thinking you were capable of recognizing sarcasm.

        Also “critical support” for what, Russian imperialism? Why does Russian imperialism deserve “critical support” while western imperialism deserves direct opposition?

        • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          thought it would be obvious I was mocking you by repeating the viewpoint you expressed without the air of pretentiousness that you surround it with, but I guess I was the stupid one for thinking you were capable of recognizing sarcasm.

          I see you’re like arguing with strawmen in your head

          Also “critical support” for what, Russian imperialism? Why does Russian imperialism deserve “critical support” while western imperialism deserves direct opposition?

          That’s what I’m asking you dumbass lol why can you lend western imperialism critical support and not to Russia? Maybe figure out the term and how it’s defined before speaking on it?

            • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Sorry, I was under the impression you were speaking in favor of NATO expansion and think that while the US is bad, it’s emdevours in Ukraine are just (this time).

              Also “critical support” for what, Russian imperialism? Why does Russian imperialism deserve “critical support” while western imperialism deserves direct opposition?

              Revolutionary defeatism

              Recognizing that yes, Putin’s Russia is a bourgeois state with highly questionable rights for sexual minorities and a husk of its former Soviet glory, its re-nationalized industries are a target for the US imperialist emdevours ripe to be privatized again. (You can see how the NATO supports racist nawalny,.but not the largest opposition force in Russia instead, etc.)

              To understand the geopolitical context of the NATO proxy war in Ukraine against Russia it helps to watch the Mearsheimer lecture on it (hardly Russian propaganda)

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

              Also Ben Norton gives a solid breakdown here

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhajzlhcgSk

              • Vilian@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                When they point “NATO expansionism”, you know that any logical discussion is beyond hope

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Let me approach this from a different angle. If a military defeat is necessary to create revolutionary conditions, is it not then in the best interest of the working class in each imperialist power for the other to win, and does that not then put the working class in each imperialist power at odds with one another?

                Don’t you believe in internationalism? Solidarity?

                How many hundreds of thousands of lives does it cost to create revolutionary conditions, and how can you be so arrogant as to cheer while they’re fed into the meatgrinder, believing with such certainty that it means you’ll get your chance at revolution?

                • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If a military defeat is necessary to create revolutionary conditions, is it not then in the best interest of the working class in each imperialist power for the other to win,

                  Yes?

                  and does that not then put the working class in each imperialist power at odds with one another?

                  Yes I would like the war to end asap and not to see Ukraines working class be forced into the meat grider to fight the imperialists fight…

                  Don’t you believe in internationalism? Solidarity?

                  Yes?

                  How many hundreds of thousands of lives does it cost to create revolutionary conditions, and how can you be so arrogant as to cheer while they’re fed into the meatgrinder, believing with such certainty that it means you’ll get your chance at revolution?

                  That’s such a perverted misrepresentation of material reality I’m not even sure where to begin. 1) Analysis does not mean justification. That’s your interpretation of it. 2) where am I cheering it on? You make it sound like I endorse it when in fact it’s NATO and it’s proponents 3) heightend contradictions improve condition for revolution is a basic historical fact…