Matt Garman sees a shift in software development as AI automates coding, telling staff to enhance product-management skills to stay competitive.

  • mashbooq@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only person in my company using AI to code writes stuff with tons of memory leaks that require two experienced programmers to fix. (To be fair, I don’t think he included “don’t have memory leaks” in the prompt.)

    • Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find that my programming speed is up 15-20 percent since I started using supermaven copilot. I also have become better at naming functions as it increases the odds of the copilot understanding what I’m trying to do.

      Also writing tests go way faster.

      • mashbooq@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Are you able to share what kinds of applications and what languages you write in? I’m still trying to grasp why LLM programming assistants seem popular despite the flaws I see in them, so I’m trying to understand the cases where they do work.

        For example, my colleague was writing CUDA code to simulate optical physics, so it’s possible that the LLM’s failure was due in part to the niche application and a language that is unforgiving of deviations from the one correct way of writing things.

        • Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry I didn’t see this earlier.

          It’s very vanilla node backend stuff with popular Frameworks such as koa and nest so that makes it easier to give me good assistance I guess.

    • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m amazed how overstated llm ability to program is. I keep trying, and I’ve yet to have any model output so much as a single function that ran correctly without modification. Beyond that it has made up APIs when I’ve asked about approaches to problems, and I’ve given it code to find bugs and memory issues I think are fairly obvious and it fails every time.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It really depends on the domain. E.g. I wrote a parser and copilot was tremendously useful, presumably because there are a gazillion examples on the internet.

        Another case where it saved me literally hours was spawning a subprocess in C++ and capturing stdin/out. It didn’t get it 100% right but it saved me so much time looking up how to do it and the names of functions etc.

        Today I’m trying to write a custom image format, and it is pretty useless for that task, presumably because nobody else has done it before.

        • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This makes sense, I’ve largely been trying to use it for things I do regularly, and I’m pretty senior, having been in the industry for some time, so I tend not to be asking the questions that will have a million examples out there. But then again, these are the sorts of things that it will need to be able to do to replace people in industry.