• Chamomile 🐑@furry.engineer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    @Gaywallet I have a couple thoughts on this:

    1. This seems like a way that device attestation could worm its way further into our devices. Right now Google is trying to watermark AI-generated photos as AI, but you could easily go the other way - if a photo hasn’t been manipulated, it’s signed with a key that is locked down to device attestation. What, your phone is rooted? That’s kinda suspicious - how am I supposed to know your photos are real?

    2. Short of that, though, I suspect that the most likely consequence of this is the videos will start being increasingly seen as necessary for true proof, since those are harder to fake - for now, at least. And of course, there will be a lot more misinformation on the internet, especially in the short term while awareness of this catches up.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Photos are never a concrete representation of the reality. Photos are being pre-processed by image processor already and we also got Photoshop. One can even fake a film based photo if he knows what to do. The proliferation of image generation models and impainting models make the access easier but image manipulation tools always exist.

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      The thing is, faking them went from a State can do it, to a professional can do it, an experienced amateur can do it, to absolutely everyone can

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        I think this is the crux of the article. In the past most people have considered photographic evidence to be very convincing. Sure, you could be removed from a photo of Stalin, and later people could do photoshop (with varying realism), now it’s a few words to make changes that many people believe without hesitation. Soon it will happen to video too, very soon.

        Most people are not ready for it. Even shitty AI photos on social media get huge reactions with barely a handful calling them out.

        • Kache@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          There’s the practical distinction between “everyone can do it with some dedicated intent” (so few actually bother) vs “everyone can do it on a whim”

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    In the thumbnail is the Tiananmen Square Tank Man.

    Are you claiming a globally televised event which lead to a complete breakdown of trade relations across the world in the 90s, didn’t happen?

    • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      No, they’re saying it would be really easy now to create a fake image that would have in the past had that level of impact.