• roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I like Paul Mooney’s take on that movie.

    You’ll have to look it up yourselves though. My complexion prohibits me from accurately quoting almost everything that Paul Mooney has ever said.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I found this comment while looking for the quote.

      The words samurai is considered the plural form. The movie is about Lord Katsumoto and his clan of samurai during the period in the transformation of Japan from a feudal society into a modern industrial power. Not exclusively about Tom Cruise’s character. Katsumoto felt that Japan was changing too rapidly and it’s losing its cultural values and traditions in the rush to become regional power.

      Still not interested in seeing a Tom Cruise movie, but it’s an interesting insight that goes past the normal knee jerk reaction.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          English (like any other language) likes to take loan words and apply its conventions to them, regardless of what the original language does. “Samurai” is singular and plural in English.

          “The Last Samurai” is vague in who it’s referring to.

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I said Japanese though, not English. “samurai” is both singular and plural in both languages

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              What are you arguing about? The statement I quoted said that “samurai” is plural. Nothing that you said has contradicted that. In fact, you’re only agreeing with it with this last statement. Doesn’t matter that it didn’t mention if it can be used as singular as it’s not relevant.