• Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one cares about custom ROMs for a Korea-only model that is clearly targeted at the business sector.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      If a custom rom can’t support it, that’s more about the custom rom than Samsung here. They will almost certainly open source the kernel driver part, and any user library could be copied from the stock rom if absolutely necessary. If a rom developer doesn’t want to do that, well that can’t be reasonably pinned on Samsung.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I disagree, if this chip is anything like Knox protection, it will self-destruct if tripped, which is intentional to prevent the rom dev from making use of it.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What is the state of Samsung kernel building? Last time I tried, they met the letter but not the spirit of actually providing usable source code.