People compare Havertz and Mount, Arteta at least knows what he’s doing with Havertz whether you agree or disagree with him. He’s trying to get the best out of his signing whereas bald fraud has no idea why he signed the likes of Mount, Antony, Malacia, etc etc
Mount was bought for the ‘best transitional football in the world’ Ten Hag wants to play. He’s not a cm traditionally, defensively, passing, ball retention he’s not Kovacic, Szoboszlai, Caicedo, Bissouma etc. But he’s smart, will press and has energy.
Not playing him last few games means Ten Hag has temporarily put on hold any long term development of his ideas because the team can’t score, McTominay is in form so has to play according to Ten Hag.
I think like Havertz you have to just go with it, you bought for a reason. Coach.
I agree that the Antony deal was the worst deal of the last season (primarily because of the price tag that ETH and the team could not negotiate). But maybe it’s a bit early to judge Mount? The guy just came from a long injury, and maybe needs some more time to settle. I don’t think Malacia was a bad signing at all though.
Im an arsenal fan, idk what you think arteta is doing with Kai. It hasnt been a scucess or worth 65m
We paid 4m for Moh Elnenny and he was also a solid player who doesnt make many mistakes.
I dont know if i would preffer mount, but they are both abject failures based on cost.
Malacia is a really good player when i have seen him.
malacia is a good signing tho. He was cheap and seems decent. He’s just been injured for a while.
Such is Man U at the moment. I feel ten Haag’s role is probably the least wanted jobs in the world right now. All the off-field drama, having a great list that is under-performing and the Glazers still doing what the Glazers do best. Man U are up sht creek without a paddle at the moment.
Ten Hag is not a fraud, but I can tell that he has little to no experience with recruitment.