Seriously that’s only for a team that is competitive. First time we get a TOP 5 pick and I see a few folks talking about take a tackle instead of any skill position ? Lmao it’s comical at this point.

To me if we end up 4 or 5 I say take Nabers from LSU. That’s only if one of the Top QBs are gone because everyone is qb needy this year.

Trade our second round to get the end of the 1st and pick up Jayden McDaniels or the best QB available

And then take tackle.

  • JonECageNutPunchB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    These are the delusional mac defenders that still want to give him another 2-10years as long as they build around him they’ll transform his decision making and arm strength 😂

  • ctpatsfan77B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Part of this is pragmatic, given that the Pats aren’t currently in position to get one of the top 3 players on offense (Williams, Maye, Harrison), and the cost might well be prohibitive to trade up for them. I think most of us would take one of those three over any tackle.

  • MissingInBrainB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, you can’t teach or coach BIG, so if the biggest OL is there with a top 5 pick that has MAXIMUM: intelligence, athleticism and whatever else you grade your OL on and you need that ever-so-necessary anchor, a guy that will be your rock for ten years, it is worth the pick. It improves your whole offense.

    Lot of ifs, however.