Ahead of the new lad starting on Sunday, I have had a rummage back through Tannehill’s game-by-game stats this season to see what would constitute an improvement in our QB play.
I think it will also help contextualise what is achievable with the current roster and let us see whether Levis’ showings over the next few games show promise for the longer term.
Below are a selection of QB stat benchmarks, with a side-by-side of where this would put a performance in comparison to the six games Tannehill has played this season:
| If Levis Achieves… | Compared to Tannehill this is… |
|---|---|
| 13 rushing yards | Better than all 6 games |
| 199 passing yards | Better than 3 games |
| 53% completion rate | Better than 3 games |
| 1 passing TD | Better than 4 games |
| 1 interception | Better than or equal to 4 games |
| 3 sacks | Better than or equal to 4 games |
| Sacked on 10% of snaps | Better than or equal to 4 games |
Source: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TannRy00.htm
If I had to make some observations, I don’t think generating comparable yardage/TD numbers is going to be the hardest part for the boy. Sacks and turnovers are going to be key given his college tape and I suspect he has the potential to blow past these figures in his first few games. In view of his lightning-fast release and Oscar-worthy play fakes, it would be great to see Tim Kelly leaning into the run and quick-game to help him adjust early on.
If we can see 220 all purpose yards, with a touchdown, one interception and under 4 sacks a game, I think that’s a positive start.
All I know is when levis is bad everyone’s gonna flip the script and say the teak and coaching is bad when they blamed Tannehill for 6 weeks.
You’re not wrong! RT’s still a very servicable passer but at the same time, I can’t look at those rushing stats and think he’s the same player of yesteryear.