A big offseason topic was the change of defensive scheme and coverages.

How did it look to you?

  • I_Set_3_AlarmsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Awesome, and it could still get even better. We seemed the worst at guarding 3 pointers, but our presence at the rim was fantastic.

    Too many offensive rebounds given up though. Especially compared to how many we were able to get

  • DeucesWild10B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perimeter defense was lacking. Some miscommunications and late switches but when it mattered it came together. Guessing more chemistry will build as these new guys get familiar with the scheme

  • SquimJimB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Perimeter defense was great. However, we are going to have a hard time against dribble pull-up 3 point shooters. This was how Quickley killed us this game.

    Paint defense was great.

    We will struggle rebounding against the better OReb teams. However, this is another area where Porzingis is helpful. Even when we gave up ORebs, Porzingis was in the paint deterring those easy putbacks. Randle and Robinson had a hard time scoring when they grabbed the ORebs and the Knicks had more success passing out. I still think starting Al would have alleviated the OReb issue.

    White/Brown/PP, though Brown especially, did great on Brunson. Jrue did great on Randle.

    • PebblyJackGlasscockOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many more games do we win this year with the opponent shooting 40+ from 3?

      Quickley is going to get PAID this offseason. (Orlando is my guess.)

      OReb teams

      NY and TOR were basically tied for best in the East last year (12), with ATL, DET, ORL, IND and CHA above 10.

      We’re going to get killed in this stat all year because our b2bs are against these teams and that’s no Al, just Luke.