Let me preface this by saying I love Garland and think he’s still one of the better guards in the league but I’m not crazy about his playstyle the last at the moment. There was a stretch two years ago before Mitchell was year where I it felt like we had the next Steve Nash and we had a perennial 20 and 10 point guard. But since Mitchell has came here, he’s almost changed his style from a true PG to someone who plays like Mitchell? It seems like he has a score first mentality right now which makes him and Mitchell kind of redundant. In 2021, he average almost 9 APG. Since then, it’s been decreasing. I understand that sometimes he has to play that way but it seems like it’s been going on since last year as well. Am I just crazy, or does it seem like his play style has changed a bit?

  • fightingirishjd8B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Garland just hasn’t even been aggressive. I’m afraid of having a lead guard whose default setting is to play passive. That’s a fine mentality if you’re Steve nash. But they need garland to score more and he’s not doing it.

    To your point, he’s also not facilitating as well as he’s capable of

  • Far_Youth_1662B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s in a tough spot. He needs to both get his shots in and be the distributor next to a guy who leads the nba in shots per game playing iso ball.

    He shoots too much, then Mobley and Allen don’t get fed ( they dont get fed enough as it is). He shoots to little, then a guy who shot 41% from 3 last year doesnt get enough attempts.

  • sallrightB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The great point guards like Kidd and Nash have a quality that’s hard to quantify, but they are just able to control the entire game somehow.

    I never saw Garland as being on that type of path. He was built in a lab to have the perfect skillset to be an NBA point guard in the 2020’s and he has that perfect skillset.

    Garland would have grown up playing mostly AAU ball where everyone is just showcasing, then he didn’t really play in college.

    So I don’t know how or where he would have actually learned how to run a team and control a game in the classic sense. He’s going to have to learn that as an NBA player.

    But again, his skillset is amazing and he’s already a very good point guard. He also seems to be noticeably more athletic and stronger this year.

  • Specialist-Ad-486B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Garland and Mitchell do not fit together. It didn’t work with cj and dame it’s not going to work with them. Garland will never be an all star playing next to Mitchell and it’s not Mitchell’s fault. they just don’t fit

  • Emergency-Top-4505B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think there’s some recency bias with Garland. There were stretches of last season where he was our best offensive player and he hasn’t had a game this season where he’s looked like that guy. Not sure if it’s the hamstring, or just a confidence issue with him right now but I still expect him to turn it around this season. He’s always been small but the defense looks a little worse this year too.

    Last year my main criticism with garland was that he wasn’t aggressive enough and needed to shoot more threes. He averaged the same number of assists as he did the year before. Rewatch the 3rd quarter of game 4 against the Knicks if you want to see just how deadly an aggressive Garland can be.

    The problem we had before we got Mitchell is teams would just focus on pressuring garland late in games and bc we had no other ball handlers or offensive creators he would have to play iso hero ball something he’s not all that good at. Getting a strong 2 or 3 guard was a primary goal of the Cavs that summer so garland could play more off ball where he’s very effective (that’s why he and Rubio were such a good fit together).