Pretty close in value, this really depends if you NEED a week 11 win with Rham on bye and if you need one position versus the other.

One thing I will caution is that Rhamondre has a great schedule down the stretch and in the playoffs. NE leaned heavily on the run vs IND in their last game and were much more successful than passing. I would expect 30+ rushing attempts from NE going forward and we could see some snow games coming up where Rham would thrive.

Use your own discretion here but I lean Rham slightly.

CHIGO

Burks is out and TB got carved by Schultz in W9 for 10/130/2TDs. Levis is going to have trouble locking on to DHop in heavy coverage this week and likely look to a secondary target with softer coverage in balance.

Yes absolutely you should. Swift > Mostert, Gibbs > Flowers > LaPorta > Engram

Probably outperforms what everyone who sells him expects

Who are your other WR’s and what is your format?

In a 10TM I tend to focus on the elites at the position and side with those trades. Ferguson is a good backup TE but that puts a lot of your eggs in the DAL basket. That may not return the value you desire in matchups like they have vs NYG this week as starters may get benched.

Also, what is your current record? If you’re clear in 1st place consolidating to an elite asset is advisable.

Good question to ask. In short, no I would recommend you keep both Diggs and Brown. Consider trading Olave away for an RB of similar value. Target Joe Mixon who’s already had his bye week and who’s offense is starting to connect. This might off you the best return in production vs similar value.

Leagues shouldn’t have vetoes.

It really depends who your qb prior to that was. If you were streaming then you get massive value above replacement with Josh Allen and the trade is great.

Very even trade. I like the Achane/Kupp side of this deal.

Kupp is certainly more valuable for ROS than Olave and Achane has a ceiling at least equal to Hall’s, if not higher.

Since your 8-1 you can afford to absorb the bye weeks this week.

From a mathematical standpoint I think this does well to produce a value but it will lack some of the context that is used in assessing player values.

Team strength, Bye weeks passed / yet to come, career arc projection relative to rookie / aging veteran etc…

I think that you could potentially represent bye weeks passed / yet to come with a linear value but that it would be difficult to do so with some other points that are typically baked into market values.

Fantastic move. I like the timing of that one.

Yes, Dell and Flowers are both high ceiling plays but I lean Dell given the Texans offense passing success. The run game is Houston us currently broken, Dell should outproduce Flowers going forward.

I like Devonta Smith more for ROS purposes but Javonte is rising in value. We probably see a slight bump for Smith following the injury to Goedert.