• 2 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 12th, 2023

help-circle








  • It doesn’t have to be correct, you don’t have to agree with it, but it at least needs to be at the level of “I understand your thinking, and I accept that you were trying to improve your team here in a non-absurd way.”

    OMG yes. If you think a trade is somewhat lopsided, that doesn’t mean you should veto. It likely just means maybe you could have tried to get that player yourself for cheaper than what you value him at. If there is any way to say both parties are getting some perceived value in a trade without evidence of collusion, even if it is just bye week coverage or a defense that causes a lot of turnovers, then it should pretty much always stand