Holmgren has a true shooting percentage of .677, compared to Wembanyama’s .517, scoring on a similar volume.

Chet is shooting 10% better from two, 15% better from three, and 12% better from the free throw line.

For comparison, during his MVP season, Embiid had a true shooting percentage of 65.5%, while Brooks was at 49.4% in an awful shooting year.

That is a 16% difference between Chet and Wemby vs. a 16.1% difference between Embiid and Brooks

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/holmgch01.html

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/wembavi01.html

  • Tearz_in_rainB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chet’s a full year older, and he’s had a year around the NBA even if he hasn’t played until now, so I’m not surprised that he is more efficient.

    VW seems to be struggling most outside the arc. He’s a .503 inside the arc, and that’s an efficient number.

    Chet was also more of a shooter in college.

    I feel like the Brooks comparison is slightly off because Brooks, though a better 3pt shooter, only shot .450 from inside the arc last year.

    Brooks wasn’t reliable from really anywhere on the floor; VW is.