• King_Of_PantsB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Watching this game and hearing Scal talk about the Dame/Giannis PnR got me thinking.

    He kept saying Milwaukee should run more PnRs with those two and the conventional wisdom is to have your best players working off each other… but do you really want your best two players playing off each other all the time?

    Giannis and Dame individually only have the energy to be involved in so many actions per game, it almost feels like you’re wasting them by having them both in that action.

    Obviously, this is a gross oversimplification but:

    25 possessions by Dame + 25 by Giannis = 50 possessions

    15 possessions by Dame + 15 by Giannis + 10 by Dame and Giannis = 40 possessions

    If you’re demanding high volume out of two guys then do you actually want them spreading their workload out as much as possible?

    The other alternative is to just add more possessions to Giannis’ already filled plate. The purpose of bringing in Dame was to lighten Giannis’ workload. I don’t know that making Giannis help Dame out on top of fulfilling his own obligations necessarily accomplishes that.

    • Theis159OPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think that was actually pretty clear to see when Giannis was off court. Sure you run a Dame and Giannis PnR when you need a bucket, but throughout the game I’d say you run more a Middleton and Giannis PnR (we have seen this can win a championship lol) and then you run a Dame and Lopez PnR.

      • lefebraveB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There you also pointed out the reason why JB-KP plays are so good for us going forward.

        • SingaporygonB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And this makes me wish we had another big sort of like KP, haha.