Stats from https://www.fantasylabs.com/nba/on-off/
| With both Pascal/Yak | Without both Pascal/Yak | With Pascal, No Yak | With Yak, No Pascal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 239 | 153 | 128 | 29 |
| Usage Rate | 20.6% | 28.2% | 24.9% | 31.5% |
| Net Rating | -0.2 | -8.7 | +14.3 | -24.0 |
| FG% | 51.2% | 37.7% | 55.2% | 47.1% |
| 2PT% | 57.3% | 43.1% | 56.8% | 43.8% |
| 3PT% | 40.6% | 29.4% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| TS% | 59.7% | 45.1% | 67.0% | 56.0% |
| Points/Poss | 0.97 | 0.82 | 1.21 | 0.97 |
| AST% | 20.1% | 34.4% | 24.1% | 30.8% |
| FT Rate | 16.3% | 12.9% | 53.4% | 23.5% |
| 3PT Rate | 37.2% | 40.0% | 24.1% | 5.6% |
| Points/36 | 16.5 | 19.0 | 26.8 | 25.7 |
Thoughts?
Can someone please explain the idea that Scottie and Pascal don’t fit together?
I don’t think there’s been a point in Scottie’s career where he’s been better off playing without Pascal.
There is no real one, ppl on this sub are just silly. Ppl see both are forwards I guess and think here durrr that means bad? Pascal is an extremely good passer for a forward and a good spacer so my thoughts have always been that it should be the opposite, especially since Scottie is also a good passer.