Stats from https://www.fantasylabs.com/nba/on-off/

With both Pascal/Yak Without both Pascal/Yak With Pascal, No Yak With Yak, No Pascal
Minutes 239 153 128 29
Usage Rate 20.6% 28.2% 24.9% 31.5%
Net Rating -0.2 -8.7 +14.3 -24.0
FG% 51.2% 37.7% 55.2% 47.1%
2PT% 57.3% 43.1% 56.8% 43.8%
3PT% 40.6% 29.4% 50.0% 100.0%
TS% 59.7% 45.1% 67.0% 56.0%
Points/Poss 0.97 0.82 1.21 0.97
AST% 20.1% 34.4% 24.1% 30.8%
FT Rate 16.3% 12.9% 53.4% 23.5%
3PT Rate 37.2% 40.0% 24.1% 5.6%
Points/36 16.5 19.0 26.8 25.7

Thoughts?

  • Eclectic_CanadianB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone please explain the idea that Scottie and Pascal don’t fit together?

    I don’t think there’s been a point in Scottie’s career where he’s been better off playing without Pascal.

    • lemon07rB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no real one, ppl on this sub are just silly. Ppl see both are forwards I guess and think here durrr that means bad? Pascal is an extremely good passer for a forward and a good spacer so my thoughts have always been that it should be the opposite, especially since Scottie is also a good passer.