Talented? Yes. But it’s not revisionist history to acknowledge that his defense was awful and although his offense very good, it was not elite. Even at his peak, he was a poor man’s Dame.
To me, Chauncey is the bigger “what if he stayed?” than Marbury.
Please stop downgrading Marbury because his career fizzled later on. He was insanely talented.
Talented? Yes. But it’s not revisionist history to acknowledge that his defense was awful and although his offense very good, it was not elite. Even at his peak, he was a poor man’s Dame.
To me, Chauncey is the bigger “what if he stayed?” than Marbury.