I understand that teams in these contracts are paying for future production, not past production. If I’m going to give you like $100M, I’d like to have some past production. Patrick Williams has done some stuff, but like that’s just… if that’s the number, if that ends up being true and the Vassell deal ends up being the comp that his agents go to, that’s a lot of cheese.

Starting about 32 minutes into The Lowe Post.

  • Muted_Dog7317B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d much rather have Vassell. He’s a much better all around player who still gives a lot on defense.

    Who do you think Pat Will is? He’s not DPOY candidate or the best defender on his team. He’s a good defender but not elite.

    • TheRealDevDevB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      agree to disagree. i’d take pat williams over vassell 10/10 times. you can always find a 6’5" wing that can dribble and shoot a little. what’s actually rare is having a forward sized beast who can guard every player on the court and doesn’t make mistakes (while being money from 3 on offense).

      • Muted_Dog7317B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean you say Vassell can shoot a little but he takes more than double the attempts of Pat Williams from 3 and shoots 39%. He’s also got a 6’10 wingspan and can play-make, and defend multiple positions. It’s not a common skillset