I hate to ask such a depressing question but the more I think about Kelce’s retirement the more I think about what it would mean for Jalen as well but then I also think about how important Lane is as well.

Most of us feel like Kelce’s retirement is on the way soon, but let’s play Devil’s Advocate for a second and pretend neither of them were going to retire yet.

If one of them were to leave, which one would be the bigger loss for the team?

  • Aerolithe_LionB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have a replacement for Kelce. 2 in fact if we need to use College C Dickerson. We have no one to replace lane

  • Rah_Rah_RU_RahB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kelce. He practically plays FB and center at the same time. And he’s more important to the push play. Ofc Lane is sick too, but I think it’s Jason despite positional value

  • sohikesB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kelce imo. Centers control the whole line. He has authority to change whatever he sees at the line. That takes years and years of experience and some still dont do it as well as Kelce. You can easily make the case that Kelce is the #1 center of all time.

    Losing Lane will suck but at least he’s not blindside

    • 32BitWhoreB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah this is what I think a lot of people forget when they say that Lane is the better overall player. He is, but Kelce has so much control over the way the offense is run and the protection is set that it’s super concerning wondering what we’ll look like when he’s gone. It has the potential to completely change how good our OL is overall - not to mention one of the reasons Lane is so good is because he has Kelce’s cadence down to the millisecond so he can jump the snap without getting a penalty. His production might actually be worse with a new center too. Basically, Lane is the better player, but Kelce is the more important one IMO.

      • sohikesB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I remember the last time Kelce actually missed a game our line suffered greatly because they had to run whatever protection was called in the huddle. His back up didn’t have the IQ to change protection schemes based on that the D lined up in.

        • 32BitWhoreB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, a lot of people just completely miss this when talking about how important Kelce is vs. Lane. He’s arguably the smartest player on the field on any given snap, and his intelligence is one of the reasons that our entire OL always looks so good. Not taking anything away from Lane, he’s a true shutdown tackle, which is as rare as a true shutdown CB these days, but without Kelce shifting protections at the line and giving him the opportunity to get his initial kick-step so perfectly timed to the snap, he likely wouldn’t be as dominant.

  • montana1991B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lane is the talent, but kelce’s ability out there to help with identifying coverages will be missed

  • No-Nose-6569B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Damn that’s a good question. I’m gonna have to say Lane, just because we’ve seen the massive drop off when he’s been injured in the past.