Something good coming out of AI, it seems.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    How is it misleading? All you’ve said is that releases have cves which is what the graph shows.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As I mentioned, all kernel major releases have cve bumps, because (also mentioned) new kernel releases have new features and drivers.

      The bump itself doesn’t show that ai is associated with more CVEs, because that bump is present after every kernel major release. It would have been better to show the bumps from previous releases to demonstrate the volume ai tools are helping to find.

      • fleinsopp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s not how the version numbers for the Linux kernel work. 7.0 is the release that follows 6.19, they are both new mainline releases in the exact same way, and the first number increasing doesn’t mean anything.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Or being introduced. Or neither of those two, because it’s an isolated graph devoid of larger context

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          But we don’t have enough information here; it says “CVE fixes per release”, we don’t know anything about them. Are these long-standing? Is some new process introducing security issues? We also have ongoing conversions of modules to rust, and lots of ongoing work.

          We can say AI tools are helping find these, and that may be true, but but this graph doesn’t say that, it just says “CVE Number Big”.