Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?
Man Utd by far… Chelsea’s only real problem right now is getting a whole new squad to gel. The Chelsea owner is actually being a good owner when you think about it - invests in the squad, has already begun planning for a stadium redevelopment/new stadium, he’s just made mistakes with recruitment, some of which still have time to prove they aren’t mistakes.
Man Utd is just a toxic place to be. The fans want the owner out, there’s the Greenwood situation, the possible Antony situation, Sancho out the team, the whole Ronaldo drama and, of course, the lack of anything on the pitch.