• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It was me. Reinstalled three times a couple days ago because I’m an idiot.

    But I’m an idiot who uses FOSS and I rather be dumb in a world of genius than a genius in a world of dumb.

  • downhomechunk@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am not one of the million, but I’m glad flatpaks exist. Anything to increase ease of use and hopefully wider linux adoption is a good thing.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      You mean GitHub signin?

      Because Flathub operates on GitHub. If you hate it that much, you could use a different Flatpak distributor (I heard Fedora has its own?)

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    By choice or by force? I’ll take flatpaks over Appimages and literally rocks over snaps, but what is this metric actually saying?

    • joojmachine@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is saying that more than one million people are actively using Flathub. What do you mean by force?

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well if there’s an application that the developer only releases a flatpak for, do I have a choice in being one of those million if there’s no easy way to compile it myself? What if I’m a newbie linuxer and cannot get all the dev tools installed?

        • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          what’s your point? if flatpak makes it easier for developers to package their software and easier for users to install it, there’s nothing wrong with it being famous

        • joojmachine@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There are no cases of this that I know of. There are some developers that don’t encourage repackaging their apps, though.

        • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          do I have a choice in being one of those million if there’s no easy way to compile it myself?

          You always have a choice. Just yesterday, I had an app’s documentation say “install brew so you can download our application and themes”. I noped right out of there and found a different application altogether.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think there’s any business entity artificially forcing the users to use it (like Firefox on Ubuntu 😉) if that’s you’re asking.

      Otherwise, the only case where the user is “forced” to use flatpak would be when the software they’re looking for is not available under their distro’s repo, which happens a lot especially in point release distros.