• IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If “your man card can be revoked” then you understand that gender is performative and conditional.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I understand that gender is made up and doesn’t matter. There is nothing girly or manly.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      For some the optionality of it is less important than the notion that if it’s performative, you can be bad at it and therefore make yourself an acceptable target for abuse, and besides that the idea that some roles can be restricted to only those with a certain set of physical characteristics is deeply ingrained in many, be that in terms gender, career, or what have you.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In fact words all those words are a bunch of gibberish and neither the world nor reality works like that. I can just question the vague and often circular premises of that argument and we’re back to square zero.

      Not against the sentiment, but you’re never going to get anywhere with that pseudoacademic bullshit.

      Edit: hahaha just keep proving my point. You’re the same as them- dogmatic fanatics with no arguments that hold up for shit.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is why I like it when I see men wear skirts/kilts, wear eyeliner and/or paint their nails. It’s not something I’m into but I think it’s cool when I see it.

        • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          57
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Is it tho? Being gay is liking other men. Why must those things be feminine things? Who decided? Warriors wore war paint. Now covering your face in whatever you like is for women. Pink used to be a boy’s color. Lesley was a boy’s name. We’re all just people doing shit.

          • Alue42@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The instant I saw this picture, I thought of the Parks and Rec scene:
            “That’s not really the attitude I expect from an award winner.”
            “Everything I do is the attitude of an award winner, because I have won an award.”

            That should be the case for the picture “Everything I do is manly because I am a man.” And the same for the person you are responding to “Everything I do is gay/straight/other because I am gay/straight/other.” That one part of someone’s identity has no bearing on defining the rest of them - ie, being gay means that he’s attracted to men but doesn’t define what he wears, how he acts, etc.

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You are conflating two very different things. About half of the gay men I’ve known were fairly or very masculine, they just were attracted to men. And I’ve known plenty of straight guys that ranged from feminine to downright flamboyant. The way you tell if someone likes men or not is either if they tell you or flirt with you, and if they’re a man, then they are gay (or bi or whatever non-strictly-straight flavor).

          Incidentally, most of the (non-trans) men I’ve known that were feminine or flamboyant were artists of some flavor, which tend to be a group with less inhibitions, so I would guess there are plenty of non-artist men that would show more femininity if they felt more comfortable with doing so.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Anyone can wear makeup or nail polish or wear a skirt, doesn’t say anything about their sexuality. Nor do all gay men do those things (I’d hazard that most don’t).

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Think of it this way…

          You’re the only person on earth. Does your gender matter anymore? Hair colour or length? Cock or boob size? What you put on your face or wear? Whether you like sewing, math, fishing, dancing, or frolicking through a field? No one’s there. You don’t have an identity because you’re never being identified by anyone. You’re not goth, gay, feminine, trans, or Scottish—you don’t know what those things are and actually never will because they won’t be invented. I mean, you could invent them by some astronomically improbably chance, but how, why, and what for? They’re all made up things along with all the socially expected tropes that come with those “identities”.

          So what you perceive as “gay” is just nothing for a lot of people. They wouldn’t have considered it, nor would care, you’d be struggling to hold their attention as you tried to explain it and they’d forget it in moments anyway. These people say “I am me”, not “I am a…”

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve had that discussion before.

      Gender roles, and thus gender presentation, are cultural for the most part. Some are common enough to multiple cultures that it approaches being just human culture.

      But even in western (us, canada, europe) cultures, there have been periods where the presentation of masculinity would be considered feminine in other eras. So gender roles & presentation aren’t fixed in a given culture.

      If I, regardless of what my genitals are, present as a man, then I am effectively the same as whatever a man is in my culture. If that also includes taking on the gender roles of “man”, then that’s another layer.

      However, this also means that when enough men shift their presentation and roles, anyone holding to the previous roles and presentation are now “less” a man in the cultural sense. It really, truly is a majority rules situation, and the minority are what get relabeled (usually).

      The more men that reject an arbitrary paradigm of masculinity, the more we shift to an open, loose definition of what is and isn’t masculine, with the eventual possibility that gender becomes so loose in definition that masculine and feminine become irrelevant terms, if the labels also lose relevance to the majority. And I believe that if enough people reject fixed gender paradigms, the terms would inevitably cease to matter.

      I mean, we’ve already started to add qualifiers. We have traditional gender roles as a specific thing as separate from current gender roles.

      This isn’t to deny that hormones and genetics will push people into behaviors that are linked to gender because they’re mostly linked to sex. But even with those pressures, we usually have room how we express those behaviors.

      It’s why I always tell folks, particularly younger folks, to not worry much about labels. Be who you are, as long as who you are isn’t a douche, and you’ll eventually find the labels that feel right. And there’s a good chance you’ll end up shifting your self over time anyway, which is fine. As long as you don’t fixate on labels as defining the person, the self, you can freely shift labels as the self shifts. It’s when you pick a label and think that you have to fit it in all ways, forever, that you run into trouble.

      So, fuck yeah. If you feel “girly”, be girly. Enjoy that shit. Be your best self. It’ll eventually work out :)

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Homophobes are cute. Me and my homies only jerk off to homophobes. Just like those old WW2 vets that invented the gay leather scene. Except now the kink is to dress up as an Ultra-American instead of a German nazi. I got a 1776 shirt literally just to fuck with.

    (One part humor, one part truth, one part bullshit. If my lame comedy makes anyone angry they aren’t living the life they should be. Treat yo self.)

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      As an amab man with long hair and emotions that is frequently misgenedered (even with facial hair) yall are down voting something that is far too true

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You seem very angry. Is everything alright in your life? I’m sorry that you’re so upset by other people being happy :(

          Enjoy punching holes in your mom’s drywall.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, the “can always tell” crowd. AKA “I don’t think this person is attractive enough to be cis.”

      • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        аҧсуа бызшәа
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        The scientist in me is sooo tempted by the idea of setting up a website where people have to classify pictures of cis and well-passing trans people by AGAB to really drive the point home that no, those fuckers CANNOT tell. They can usually only tell when the person in question is in the progress of medical transition which is an instance of “no shit Sherlock, why do you think we want to get this done as quickly as possible”. And yes, Enbys are a bit of a different story, but even a lot of them pass very well as the opposite of their AGAB, even though they often don’t even identify as that.

        The big issue with this is that the vast majority of people making those kinds of statements are incapable of thinking rationally and instead just continue being bigots.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Idk dude I ngl I look like a long-haired Charlie Puth (to the point where different people have told me that I look like him on the same night lmao) but somehow people still get the wrong idea lol.

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Then as a man, I choose to act like a girly-Man©. See? Has Man© and that symbol makes it official. That means I can do anything <‘ronswanson meme.jpg’> Checkmate. Easy victory

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reactionaries have no underlying principles, they just react, violently in some cases. If you guide them through their own cobbled-together set of values and show the contradictions, they get angry and start yelling, because to them, they are their own moral arbiter and a challenge to their status quo is an enemy.

    Gender is a Social construct and getting upset at people for being outside the bimodal spectrum conservative society expects them to be is utterly pointless, stupid, and harmful.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    it’s designed so that you can’t win except by being and doing precisely what you’re told. this is because it’s designed by evil people and promoted by weak people.

      • Enzy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Svenska
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        4E 6F 6E 2D 62 69 6E 61 72 79 21

        68 65 78 2D 69 6E 61 72 79 3F

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          46 72 6F 6D 20 74 68 65 20 6D 6F 6D 65 6E 74 20 49 20 75 6E 64 65 72 73 74 6F 6F 64 20 74 68 65 20 77 65 61 6B 6E 65 73 73 20 6F 66 20 6D 79 20 66 6C 65 73 68 2C 20 69 74 20 64 69 73 67 75 73 74 65 64 20 6D 65 2E 20 49 20 63 72 61 76 65 64 20 74 68 65 20 73 74 72 65 6E 67 74 68 20 61 6E 64 20 63 65 72 74 61 69 6E 74 79 20 6F 66 20 73 74 65 65 6C 2E 20 49 20 61 73 70 69 72 65 64 20 74 6F 20 74 68 65 20 70 75 72 69 74 79 20 6F 66 20 74 68 65 20 42 6C 65 73 73 65 64 20 4D 61 63 68 69 6E 65 2E 20 59 6F 75 72 20 6B 69 6E 64 20 63 6C 69 6E 67 20 74 6F 20 79 6F 75 72 20 66 6C 65 73 68 2C 20 61 73 20 74 68 6F 75 67 68 20 69 74 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 6E 6F 74 20 64 65 63 61 79 20 61 6E 64 20 66 61 69 6C 20 79 6F 75 2E 20 4F 6E 65 20 64 61 79 20 74 68 65 20 63 72 75 64 65 20 62 69 6F 6D 61 73 73 20 79 6F 75 20 63 61 6C 6C 20 74 68 65 20 74 65 6D 70 6C 65 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 77 69 74 68 65 72 2C 20 61 6E 64 20 79 6F 75 20 77 69 6C 6C 20 62 65 67 20 6D 79 20 6B 69 6E 64 20 74 6F 20 73 61 76 65 20 79 6F 75 2E 20 42 75 74 20 49 20 61 6D 20 61 6C 72 65 61 64 79 20 73 61 76 65 64 2C 20 66 6F 72 20 74 68 65 20 4D 61 63 68 69 6E 65 20 69 73 20 69 6D 6D 6F 72 74 61 6C 2026 20 45 76 65 6E 20 69 6E 20 64 65 61 74 68 20 49 20 73 65 72 76 65 20 74 68 65 20 4F 6D 6E 69 73 73 69 61 68 2E

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    First half is a conservative argument (gender roles)

    Second half is a liberal argument (abolish gender roles)