• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s loads of evidence linking excessive phone and social media use with mental health issues, and taking phones away is an easy win.

    • Buttons@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t have time to review all the research that has been done on the topic, but fortunately others have done a review of the existing studies:

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200624/ concludes “Despite the fears held around wireless technologies, we believe that at this stage there is not enough evidence supporting a causal negative relationship between MP/WD use and children and adolescent’s mental health to justify particular public health interventions.”

      And this isn’t a review, but here’s one additional study:

      https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2022/11/children-mobile-phone-age.html says “Stanford Medicine researchers did not find a connection between the age children acquired their first cell phone and their sleep patterns, depression symptoms or grades.”

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So I did a quick search through the scholarly literature and the consensus is overwhelmingly the opposite of your claim. So much so that I’ve decided not to link any studies (there are literally thousands). Science isn’t perfect and statistics alone guarantee many ambiguous results, some of which you seem to have found.

        • Buttons@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It would help if you could link to at least one of the thousands. What’s one you think makes a strong case? I’m not sure if you’re referring to actual studies or, maybe, confusing blog posts and “expert” opinions with actual studies.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s also lots of evidence linking bandages with bleeding. Let’s try taking away bleeding people’s bandages and see if they get better

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mom: “Honey, try reading a book or something for once. You’re almost about to graduate from high school and you’ve literally never read a book to completion in your entire life. Actually, I’m going to say only 1 hour of cell phone time a night until you finish a book of your choosing.”

      OP: *This post*

      • Buttons@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’m 30+ and, granted, I haven’t given my daughter a cellphone, and I think well of parents who are careful about how their children use technology.

        It’s a meme. It’s not super clear, but it’s memorable.

        One belief I’m trying to express with this meme is that most laws created “to protect the children” are not really about protecting children. I know that’s a hot take (/s). For example, my state has recently said “to protect the children, let’s require all adults to upload their government ID before posting on any website”, and the skeptical part of me thinks that’s not really about the kids.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think the issue here encompasses several factors: 1) you seem to be conflating the kind of moral panic driven legislation which has historically always existed with a silencing tactic aimed at dismissing youth-driven cultural criticism and 2) this meme screams low hanging fruit, appealing to the emotions of young people for whom having their phone taken away is like torture while also engaging in the, at the moment, very popular denigration of older Americans as being out of touch and dismissive of continuously worsening societal issues. Point 1 is understandable, as criticizing new things as being a corrupting influence on young people is as old as dirt, as is the propensity for the powers that be to dismiss cultural and material criticisms of the worsening state of peoples’ lives in hard times. And while they may exist as a part of a shared rhetorical and ideological ecosystem, their relationship is too complex to be purely causal, as your meme seems to be suggesting.

  • FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pretty sure excessive phone use leads to this kind of doomerism so might not be a bad idea to force kids to touch some grass.

    • Gabu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Doomerism” when you live in DoomLand - Hellhole is justified. Only a total, worthless moron would think otherwise.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Even though you’re right, the attitude is unhelpful. We should try to fix things; besides I’m not sure if you guys noticed but an entire generation of 10 year olds is glued to their social media. It’s sad AF. Here are some of the results:

        Even more bizarre, and brace yourselves for this stat, the average boomer is LESS likely to say that “feminism is bad“ than the average gen z’er. No joke. Almost certainly a result of social media overconsumption. Every parent I know with the exception of one allows their kids unrestricted access to the internet 24/7. Afterwards they collect mental illnesses like Pokémon. “Oppositional defiance disorder” is the funniest one, look it up.

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          10 year olds? Most people who have access are on social media all the time just like people before that were on the newspaper, radio, or book all the time.

          Maybe this is something I am just failing to grasp but I don’t understand how social media is more harmful than basically every media. I can’t begin to tell you how much damage buddy cop dramas did to people’s perspectives of cops and how that created a more militant police force.

      • eltimablo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s still beauty in the world and it depresses me that you can’t find any for yourself.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s beauty in the wings of a butterfly. Will that stop climate change, poverty, war and violence?

    • Buttons@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Kids are sad and have problems, people think this is because of cellphones, so they want to take away the kid’s cellphones, but maybe kids are sad because of other problems.

      See: https://lemmy.world/post/12059331

      In general, there’s been lots of talk and bills related to regulating social media, a year or two ago it was “ban tik tok”, now it’s regulate social media and take away kid’s cellphones. Lot’s of talk about it, lots of time on the evening news about it. Meanwhile, nobody does anything about the big problems and the evening news wont mention them.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes kids are sad in part because of their cellphone, online harassment and bullying is worse than it’s ever been, it’s an issue in classes too and it’s one thing that can easily be fixed.

        If the news you check don’t cover the other issues then change your news sources.

        Edit: Funny that you ignored the comments in your link

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Explain how taking a kid’s phone away makes them more capable of defending against online harassment. That seems super counterintuitive. If a kid doesn’t have a cell phone their bullies can spread whatever rumours they want online and it won’t be challenged or reported.

        • Buttons@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think a lot of those things are good. Limit cellphones in schools, good. Require websites to put a “content rating” in their HTML responses which would help make filtering the internet a lot easier, good. Require cellphone manufacturers to give instructions on how parents can setup filters on their children’s phones, good.

          Require all adults to upload their government papers before participating in the most important speech forum of our time, bad. I think the laws created to “protect the children” aren’t really about protecting children (not exactly a hot take).

          I have a challenge for you, and then a prediction:

          My challenge is to look at this graph and form a world view that explains it. Certainly there’s more behind these numbers than cellphones. Suicide rates were also high around 1990, why?

          My prediction is that if we take away kid’s cellphones, it will not actually help them and they will still be unhappy, and people will throw up their hands and say “what more can we do?”. Well, what more we can do is address those big problems in the first panel of my meme.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I see that and I think both can’t be compared as the curve is much more concerning at the moment so it would be illogical to assume the reason why it’s going up must be similar.

            Otherwise just look at the people in power and the geopolitical situation at the time. Increases during Republican mandates (public services reduced) except for under GWB where the US had “something to fight for”.

            • Buttons@programming.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That first chart I posted made it look like suicide rates were going into exponential growth recently, but “the curve” does plateau and seem to hover around the 1990’s levels. See following chart, also, note how this chart makes things look unprecedented because they cut off the 1990s.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Sure but it still doesn’t prove that the reason why it increased is the same as it was in the 80s though, the only way we could know isn’t with those two graphics but by analyzing the reasons why they do it. You’re coming to a conclusion without enough information, that’s very dangerous.

                • Buttons@programming.devOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Speaking of “enough information”:

                  I think blaming cellphones, and even blaming social media to some extent, is like blaming video games in the 90’s. There’s lots of opinions, lots of “experts” who also have opinions, and not a lot of scientifically valid research to support those opinions. This is what I’m making fun of in the meme.

                  You say that is “very dangerous”, maybe. I’ll note that (at the time of writing) I’m the only one who has linked to anything in support of my views and conclusions. So my views are, apparently, the least “dangerous” in the thread.

  • Traister101@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    I love everybody missing the point by trying to be super smart and tell you that you can use phones too much. Computers of all sorts folks just cause you browse lemmy on your pc doesn’t mean you are better than anybody else.

    Primarily I think the issue is social media. Instagram, Twitter, Facebook you know the ones. If you use these platforms a ton you should uh stop you’ll feel better. One of the best decisions I made was deleting my Instagram, Twitter and Facebook account something like 5 years back. If you can’t just delete your account put a time limit on how long you can use the app. Have a good think about how much of your day you want to be mindless scrolling.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You really think OP is trying to derail discussion of the effects of kids having phones, and not, say, trying to draw the attention to the fact that the people in charge are doing fuck all to solve much more serious problems that also cause anxiety in kids?

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Any excuse to further marginalize young people and exclude them from society. Fellow old people never fail to disappoint me.