• seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Assange is a bit of a scumbag, but unrelatedly, his efforts for freedom of information should not land him in US torture prisons like many others.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not a single non US citizen should be extradited to the US. The US has the worst prison system and punishments outside of some really cruel regimes. They also refuse to work with international criminal courts.

        Besides I’m pretty sure the guy only committed a crime in Sweden and not the US.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            How is he full of shit? Care to pick up leaks from wikileaks and point out which ones are bullshit and which ones aren’t?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                23
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                9 months ago

                His moral righteousness is irrelevant to the fact that he is being persecuted for journalism.

                It’s not like the core thing he did to even be noticed is relevant.

                The fuck does this mean? The core thing he did to be noticed is also the thing that’s getting him persecuted.

                • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I feel like you’re not allowing two statements to be true.

                  1. Assange is being doggedly pursued by the US for leaking state secrets. No I do not think he deserves to be punished for information he released like with Afghanistan. I think we are better for it and clearly this is the US making an example of him. Obviously we all knew he would be pursued, but again, I think that was the morally right thing to do, and I believe in protecting whistleblowers

                  2. I also take umbrage with any attempts to make him out to be a good person or in any way virtuous, which is what the comment I responded to did. He isn’t. He had my support when he was standing for transparency, and he lost it when it became clear he saw leaks as a tool for his political preferences and friends.

                  We can hold these two ideas at the same time.

                  As for the sexual assault allegations against him, I have no clue what to think the waters are too muddy there. So I just don’t engage that generally.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I also take umbrage with any attempts to make him out to be a good person or in any way virtuous, which is what the comment I responded to did.

                    Did we read the same comment? They literally called him a scumbag. 🙄

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  moral righteousness is irrelevant to the fact that he is being persecuted for journalism.

                  I think the question is, when does the line between journalist and espionage intersect?

                  Does his state sponsored participation in election interference count as journalism? Did his misinformation campaign during the Catalan independence movement count as journalism? How about the attempt to bribe the Trump administration for the ambassador seat to Australia?

                  There’s a reason every serious journalist that Assange utilized to launch wikileaks has not only abandoned the project, but has accused Assange of financial fraud, miss handling information, and endangering their sources.

                  I don’t think Julian Assange is a journalist, I think he just likes being famous, and at one point journalism was a way to do that. I don’t think he should be in jail for the rest of his life, but I also don’t think he deserves Carte Blanche for everything he’s done based on his prior “journalistic integrity”.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    There’s a reason every serious journalist that Assange utilized to launch wikileaks has not only abandoned the project, but has accused Assange of financial fraud, miss handling information, and endangering their sources.

                    Yeah, because they’d be hunted down by the US government right alongside Assange.

              • Ferk@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                someone painting him as a morally righteous

                The first thing @seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM said was: “Assange is a bit of a scumbag” …

                The closest thing to “righteousness” said was: “his efforts for freedom of information should not land him in US torture prisons like many others.”

                Which, being true, it’s absolutely not challenged or contradicted by anything you said in response.

                Note that “freedom of information” is totally compatible with “picking and choosing” the manner in which you exercise that freedom. In fact, I’d argue that the freedom of “picking and choosing” what’s published without external pressure is fundamentally what the freedom of press is about.

                Assagne (like any other journalist) should have the freedom of “picking and choosing” what facts he wants to expose, as long as they are not fabrications. If they are shown to be intentionally fabricated then that’s when things would be different… but if he’s just informing, a mouthpiece, even if the information is filtered based on an editorial, then that’s just journalism. That’s a freedom that should be protected, instead of attacking him because he’s publishing (or not publishing) this or that.

      • Hubi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Can you really blame the man for picking sides after all the US has done to him personally over the years?

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes. Wikileaks is supposed to be a tool of transparency. Not a tool for his political revenge.

          • Hubi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not saying I condone what he did, but I can understand it from his perspective. I’d probably do the same thing if there were a country responsible for ruining my life and health and I had the information to inflict some damage.

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I am not saying I condone what he did

              I’m not sure what we are debating/discussing. If you’re going to claim you are a bastion of transparency and information for the general public, then no, you can’t weaponize your site and omit politically damaging information about political groups you agree with/are aligned with.

              That’s not just revenge against the US. That’s failing to provide the transparency you claim to stand for. He chose to obscure information based on his own whims. How is that not an issue?

              Wikileaks had their own leak and it was a very interesting read.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                If you care about transparency so much i don’ think you would be here trying to belittle someone who spent the past years in jail for the sake of transparency.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What does this have do with the fact he’s been jailed for years and is waiting extradition to usa? It literally looks like you are trying to spread dirt on him for no reason other than choosing what story to cover, something most publisher do on daily basis and on a much worst scale.

        “Trump totally didn’t offer him a pardon to say Russia had nothing to do with it.”

        You may have missed the part where he’s still in jail and the trump government had a plot to have him assasinated

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange#Later_years_in_the_embassy

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        @BolexForSoup just to be clear are you saying that journalists with a political or ideological slant should not be afforded the same protections as other journalists?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d say since the first full year of him living in an embassy ended, we can’t be justified to call him a scumbag.

      Other than that - his sense of humor in the NetBSD fortune files and other traces in the Internet maybe sucks, but he’s a better role model than Snowden (whose life is somehow much easier, which is suspicious really).

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because unlike Snowden you can somewhat trace him before the big story which made him known, and that trace is connected with, as I said, NetBSD and cypherpunk culture, the good stuff.

          While Snowden is some messiah which came out of nowhere and is still free and well. It’s just suspicious for me.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Freedom of information? He was pretty selective about which bits he released back in 2016. That guy can rot in prison for all I care.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          “journalist”

          You have got to be kidding me…

          This dude is a Russian asset and pawn. Russia is our enemy

          Do the math.