• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean I don’t really see the point of using your real name on your system unless you often forget who you are. I would praise my friend tho for having the correct skeptical reaction even if it should be relatively harmless.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      If a machine is going to have multiple users (all my computers have multiple profiles for family members) all those users have to be called something, and I’ve not got the energy or the creativity to come up with fun and funky usernames for every system when my actual name is more than good enough.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Username is required for the home folder & login; name isn’t required for anything

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I also think it’s a healthy attitude but at the same time it’s sad that people can’t trust their own devices any longer.

      Using your real name can have benefits, like metadata in office documents or things like that. If you are sure your devices are yours and secure, there shouldn’t be a reason not to use your own name. Unfortunately this isn’t the case anymore if you are using anything else but Linux

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Many jurisdictions recognize pen names & other aliases which a username is & could also be put in the document. Many might prefer not inserting their real name into things by default & if that privacy is desired as default, all the more reason to skip the real name.