I have to admit, I really don’t like this. The old logo looked pretty neat and the “://” part was a stroke of genius.
They even implemented it in Firefox: moz://a redirects to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/
As will any moz://
I 100% agree. I don’t mind design refreshes. I think I’m in the minority of loving the current Firefox logo.
But this just sucks. They really took their unique, clever wordmark logo (but still very modern and minimal!) and replaced it with a bland, trendy 2022 typeface.
I know this is super petty, but this might convince me to find another password manager and method for syncing tabs. Might try librewolf, too. Rebranding invites users to re-evaluate their view on a brand, and mine isn’t changing for the better.
I mean, if the intention is to reflect the utterly bad decisions Mozilla has made, this new logo would be spot on
Why do companies constantly feel an urge to update their logos? I see this as marketing teams needing to show they are doing something so they come up with a “project” and then convince the management it’s necessary…
I do like the new logo, but it is a bit sad to see the :// gone.
Nope. I mean I don’t really care. But it definitely doesn’t appeal to me.
Also hier soll das neue eingebettet sein
Und das ist das alte
Das neue ist hässlich
Does the flag look like a chicken to anyone else?
Thanks, now I can’t unsee it.
TBH, it’s better as a chicken
Great sign that organizational resources are being arranged into a pointless circlejerk safely removed from browser & Thunderbird development, or finding opportunities to monetize that aren’t products nobody asked for outside the nonprofit corporate bureacracy
What a complete waste of everybodys time.
Why did they copy i3?