• N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    For hundreds of thousands of years, we spent 2 or 3 hours a day hunting and gathering, then chilled out and had fun the rest of the time. That’s what our bodies are designed for.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those numbers are off, and there’s some studies showing that what people simplify to “chilling out” was also work, just done in groups back at the settlement. For example, preparing the animal you caught for eating, using the tools of the era, takes time. Unfortunately there are a lot of people understanding only the bare bones cliffnotes of historic life, then using it as fuel for their (justified but somewhat misinformed) campaign against the workload expected of us in modern life.

      That said, the general take away is correct: humans used to be far more active in the completion of their daily duties.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Back when we lived to the ripe old age of 38.

      (Im kidding, I know that was mostly due to infection and whatnot)

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The ‘age of 38’ thing isn’t even due to infection ir disease, or even a thing at all. 38 was the average between the high number of infant deaths and the normal lifespan of someone who didn’t.

        Ok, women giving birth skewed it a bit too. Men didn’t die in battle as much as people think, since most battles were decided when a small portion of the losing side died and the rest fled.

        • MBM@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Do we have numbers for the hunter-gatherer time that can even be skewed by infant deaths?

          Edit: as it turns out, yes, absolutely. Wikipedia says the lifespan is around 21-37 years but 57% died before 15 and 64% of those that don’t would also reach 45.