• flying_gel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I went from using slackware late 90s early 00 to Mac OSX in early/mid 00. When coming back to Linux late 00 early 10s I was so disappointed in the Linux distros. I tried Ubuntu but was very disappointed in the lack of newer versions of third party software in their repo. Tried Arch for a while and while packages were up to date, every now and then the OS updates would mess something up and I had to start troubleshooting.

    It might be better now, but I eventually gave up and went to FreeBSD about 10 years ago. Stable base and separate up to date third party feels like the best of both worlds. Not sure if any llinux distro offers something like that now. No snap, no flatpack, just a base os and up to third party date packages.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am not here to convince you, but if you happen to look at Linux again, check out Void.

      Arch, but it’s tested (no dis to arch here… Just a fact).

      I don’t know much about BSD, but apparently it’s an hybrid of Linux and BSD. The Void creator is an NetBSD dev.

      Not the best source, but here: https://itsfoss.com/void-linux/

      • flying_gel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Looks interesting. I do have a Linux machine for work due to software requirements. I will have a look at void.

        • PushButton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, I believe it takes more than a day or 2 to really test a driver.

          “Testing team” or not, by seeing the releases of, for example nvidia, I don’t take their “testing” seriously…

          No wonder so many people are complaining about the stability of arch…BTW… ;)

          Source: Nvidia “verified” drivers