I have also played with the thought, though it might just give them ideas as patents don’t last forever and probably don’t even protect non-corporations that well if some big company decides it wants what you have.
In practice, patents don’t really restrict the availability of a technology, from a consumer perspective. Patent holders regularly licence the use of patents. The only purpose of a patent is to fund research costs by creating some guaranteed revenue stream for the patentor.
The only time what you describe happens is if a company ignores its prime directive to generate profit. Such benevolent companies are a very rare thing.
I usually hate this patent fuckery, but maybe this is a good thing. Using ai like this is stupid so patenting this would limit companies doing it.
I should start patenting evil ideas so companies can’t implement them
I have also played with the thought, though it might just give them ideas as patents don’t last forever and probably don’t even protect non-corporations that well if some big company decides it wants what you have.
In practice, patents don’t really restrict the availability of a technology, from a consumer perspective. Patent holders regularly licence the use of patents. The only purpose of a patent is to fund research costs by creating some guaranteed revenue stream for the patentor.
The only time what you describe happens is if a company ignores its prime directive to generate profit. Such benevolent companies are a very rare thing.
That’s a very optimistic view. Not licencing your patent to your competition is absolutely a profit driven decision that harms the end user.