- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
At first I was sceptical, but after a few thought, I came to the solution that, if uutils can do the same stuff, is/stays actively maintained and more secure/safe (like memory bugs), this is a good change.
What are your thoughts abouth this?
So you prefer closed-source code to potentially unsafe open-source code?
Already fixed, in software that’s existed for years and is used by millions. But Oh no, memory issues, let’s rewrite that in <language of the month>! will surely result in a better outcome.
Rsync is great software, but the C language fates it to keep having memory issues in spite of its skilled developers.
Preventing a bug from being possible > fixing a bug.
Rust isn’t language of the month unless you’ve been asleep for a decade, old man
What about the rust version is closed source?
This whole post is very disingenuous.
Edit: oh you’re a troll
They’re MIT licensed.