no, modal text editors are just nicer to use
no, modal text editors are just nicer to use
It’s extremely easy to get started
stop using nano, if you want a non modal editor use vim -y
not really, gnu is still a big professional project
Raygui, fltk, GTK. Qt if you’re working in C++
free software is a political movement
lunduke is possibly the biggest asshole in the Linux space. do not share his garbage “journalism”.
Kakoune, NixOS, dwl.
Not on Sid and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.
This is false.
You can’t really choose the release cycle on a per package basis practically:
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
Pacman also supports optional dependencies.
It’s way faster though.
Maybe mention tiling WMs too. Beginners may not directly be interested but it’s still a very important benefit of Linux.
The package manager does matter, Void and Arch have good package managers, while Debian, Fedora, and OpenSUSE have bad package managers.
if you know your way around a Linux system, it’s really quite easy.
the rest also isn’t just an opinion, cinnamon does not have an equivalent to kdenlive, krita, or kate. even the existing applications are just not on the same level. it’s an acceptable desktop, but plasma and gnome are just better.
Wayland has objectively better multi monitor support in every case. You were encountering tearing issues before switching, maybe you just didn’t notice.
mesa is outdated by default, not supporting rx 7000 cards unless you use the edge iso.
please just use spaces, it makes everything easier